Posted by 
Your builder and you have entered into a verbal building contractor when he agrees to complete your work and you accept his pricing since the law presumes that both of you intended to establish legal relations. Why use a formal building home contract when you have a contract as long as you were both “of sound mind”? Check over here.
Let’s imagine you wish to replace your leaky garage roof with a lovely new fibre-glass roof. When the builder shows up and offers you £1000, you accept. Although he has seen it done, your builder has never installed a fibreglass roof. The materials are far more expensive than he anticipated, and the job takes much longer than he anticipated.
After completing it, he sends you an invoice for $2000.
Even if you inform him that the agreed price was half that, he insists that he definitely said between £1K and £2K. You refuse to back down and offer him the agreed-upon £1K, which he accepts. He then accuses you of owing him an additional £1000 and takes you to small claims court. Why fret? Because you honoured the verbal agreement and paid the agreed-upon sum to the other party after completion, you go into court with confidence that everything will be okay.
He testifies in court that he told you it would cost £2k and details the cost of the labour, supplies, and other expenses. You explain to the court that you only handed him that amount because the agreed-upon fee was only £1,000. When it’s one person’s word against another, the court typically always halves the difference and compels you to pay him £500 plus costs. If there had been a documented agreement, the builder would have been forced to accept the agreed-upon sum and attribute it to experience.
You are essentially signing a contract without the necessary information.
Some maintenance contractors may claim that a written contract is not necessary for a task of this size, but you should always insist on using one. A trustworthy builder will have no issues signing your contract because he is aware that it will safeguard both you and him.
Some dishonest repair technicians will claim they require your signature on a contract before they can go pick up the parts to fix your boiler, heater, etc. You recognize the kind of thing, “I’m sorry, but your warp drive abbreviators are destroyed. Could you please sign this so that my manager knows I have your consent to pick up a new one? The cost will be around £50.”
He’ll leave for the cafe or another employment and return after a short while. He will install the new component before handing you the previously signed contract that now includes the costs. $50 call-out fee, three hours of labour at $50 an hour, and $50 plus tax for parts. You may contend that he misled you into thinking it would cost you roughly £50 rather than £250, but it won’t help you since your signature appears on the contract.
Conclusion:
Because the engineer has a contract that you signed, you wouldn’t stand a chance in court if you refused to pay. You can either demand that all the information be input prior to signing, decline, or utilize your own maintenance contract.